Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Always Evergreen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Always Evergreen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As discussed at the talk page for this article, it seems the sources used in this article are more about Willow Osborne than the group itself. They do have a somewhat significant following on social media, but that isn't what determines notability. I can't find any reliable sources that reference the duo itself, and the majority of the sources in the article are user-generated, including YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn, and as such don't count when determining notability

As an admin mentioned in response on the talk page, notability doesn't automatically extend to the band, and as such, an article about Osborne with a smaller section about the band is probably a much better option. The issue isn't Osborne's lack of notability, it's the lack of notability for the band itself.  Bsoyka 🗣️  01:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Bsoyka  🗣️  01:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Sun8908 &#8239;Talk 08:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the nominator. There could possibly be a short article on Willow Osborne, who got some media notice back when she was a tween prodigy. But this article is about the group and there is almost nothing to say about them beyond the fact that they got a few gigs so far. Also they have existed for less than a year. That's why the article needs to fill space with one member's life story and a few non-notable snippets about the other member's academic record. The talk page discussion referenced by the nominator is especially fascinating, as we watch the article creator trying to tackle these concerns and coming up empty. Always Evergreen is simply ineligible for an article here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.