Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Lang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Alyssa Lang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet GNG. The article in it's present state is essentially a resume, and does not show any coverage that would confer notability. After a BEFORE, I was not able to find many sources, save for profiles on the website of companies she work(s/ed) for. Vermont (talk) 02:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I swear I'm getting tried of this bleep. I'll still pissed over the deletion of Holly Sonders and now with this. Enough with this BS. I can't make a page without a threat of deletion minutes later. If this gets deleted, my might delete some pages for the heck of it, TRY ME!!!!!!! You've been warned Dwightforrm (talk) 02:33, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Could you please clarify how you intend to "delete some pages for the heck of it". Thank you. Nick (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. --Pontificalibus  06:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I am still pissed about the deletions Holly Sonders and Kelly Nash. Sonders had more content than some of these other pages and yet her page gets deleted and those other pages stay on the damn site and like Sonders some of those people like her aren't "famous enough" and their pages are still on here. You guys are picking and choosing and I'm tired of the hypocritical BS. Maybe I should pick and choose myself.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Comments on the notability of the subject, please.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 03:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete While I think that this is a bad faith nomination (the nominator seems to be mad that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS was not a keep reason and is now going after the WP:OTHERSTUFF root and branch), I don't think this sportscaster meets and notability guideline. It doesn't help that most hits on google are of articles she wrote.  There might be sources, but they are buried mighty deep as far as I can tell. Rockphed (talk) 14:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rockphed.4meter4 (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.