Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amélie Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Amélie Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Amélie Company is an advertising agency which fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. I cannot find in depth coverage in any regional or national independent source, though its ad campaign for the Colorado Department of Transportation seems to have been applauded. The article reads like an advertisement and was created by a one purpose account. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 01:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. The awards listed are not significant and well known. Such content belongs on the company web site, not here -- WP:NOTSPAM. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable; trivial, promo piece. Kierzek (talk) 16:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep or merge If it was just the award I might agree, but the Company was selected by The Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) to develop public education on legal marijuana use after a "competitive application process" — which basically makes them a public contractor. Their campaign did receive coverage in CBS and Huffington Post as well as local Denver papers. Seraphim System  ( talk ) 04:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The only good source is one article by the Denver Post. Ifnord (talk) 14:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.