Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg  jhp  jm  16:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources are a 2 paragraph description in an interview with the directors, dead links, the production company (Films for Food is a subsidiary), and dead links. Not much else found in BEFORE. Icewhiz (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep has reliable sources coverage including ref 6 which I fixed which is not an interview and is significant coverage in a reliable source South African Times, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The two possible RSes are ref6 and ref7 - which seem PRish and are copies of eachother (suggesting a press release reprint) - regardless this is 2 paragraphs of coverage in a longer item - far from SIGCOV.Icewhiz (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  04:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist
 * Weak keep, particularly on the basis it was championed by the South African government and also won a Best Film award. The sourcing is weak (the South African and SA Times articles are identical) but recognition in Africa and Europe fits my definition of general notability. Sionk (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: I'm not completely sold on the refs, but enough to not feel comfy about deletion either. Sorta a "ties go to the runner" deal.  Nha Trang  Allons! 19:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  09:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.