Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaja Inti

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 2 July 2005 17:13 (UTC)

Amaja Inti
I beleive this is a fake article. Google search returns no entries. Jgritz 16:11, 15 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Speedy even. Nonsense. - Longhair | Talk 16:29, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I sorted the stub mainly out of habit, but it doesn't appear to be of any real use. --Jemiller226 23:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

So you think she is fake? She is real, she is simply forgotten by the Spanish, she was a woman, and the Spanish didn't know in a strange way and weird circumcances she was a Sapa Inca, this is a way to get her in the history books...
 * She may be perfectly real, but Wikipedia needs proof. Perhaps if you offer some, the VfD will be dismissed entirely. --Jemiller226 02:31, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, what means VfD?

VfD = Votes For Deletion. You'll have to come up with some evidence of this person to enable this article to remain. I checked my copy of "Conquest of the Inca" last night, and found no mention of this person. "Inti" is quechuan for sun god. There is also a festival called Inti Raymi, but no Amaja Inti. Maybe create an account and put this on your user page people can read your opinions, as opposed to an article. Jgritz 08:03, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Alright I will make a account, tomorrow, because today I'm really busy.
 * No Google hits for "Amaja Inti", except Wikipedia and its mirrors. The article is extremely badly written. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion as nonsense. In the unlikely case the article is not a hoax (the name may be misspelled as well), it should be started again from the scratch. - Mike Rosoft 16:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverified. --Etacar11 23:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete This may be real; I'm no expert at Incan theology... --Adun 05:09, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

I think this article is real, if he/she would make a fake article he/she woulden't bother to answer on this page again... and let him/her edit the article again to detailled article ? and a lot of people are forgotten ... (unsigned comment by Muzz, user's first edit)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.