Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amalgamates (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Amalgamates
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The last nomination was discussed in 2006 and since then the criteria under WP:MUSIC have become stricter. In that context, the page does not list sufficient reliable sources or indicated notability. The long list of awards is inflated, the organisation that awards them (the Contemporary A Cappella Society) appears to be closely linked to the group. The overriding sense from the article is that this constitutes a college choir with little national profile, no chart success nor any international touring commitments. Karst (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:BAND, which says that "Musicians or ensembles ... may be notable if ... [they have] won first, second or third place in a major music competition." This article lists multiple first-place finishes at the Contemporary A Cappella Recording Awards. Personally, I don't think that the standards at WP:NMUSIC are strict enough, but the guideline apparently reflects community consensus, so I feel compelled to vote "keep." -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. The completion is not major. No other criteria are met. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The competition is not notable enough to justify keeping this otherwise non-notable group. -- Dane 2007  talk 14:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.