Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amalis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing as 'keep' because when one discounts the sockpuppet nomination, there are no remaining arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Amalis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It seems to be the article have no valid sources or not enghou so it need to link it with a notable articles and news paper.@Johnricke Jhonricke (talk) 11:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - there is no requirement for the references to be in the English language Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, multiple sources already cited. Why are these not valid? NemesisAT (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.