Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aman Dubey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Aman Dubey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am not aware of any criteria that makes a social media spokesperson for a sub-party notable but this fails WP:NPOL by a mile (or at least as it appears to me.) He's never been elected to a position that qualifies under NPOL and he has no actual coverage. Being a member of INC is in and of itself not even a claim of importance either. Praxidicae (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — I will note that this piece cited in the article is possibly significant coverage, but I don't speak Hindi. Barring more clearly relevant Hindi sources, I agree that Dubey fails the notability requirements based on a look at English sources. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's just a quote from him (I translated it), nothing actually significant. The rest has nothing to do with him. Praxidicae (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: faisl WP:NPOL ChunnuBhai (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * "Delete" Dubey fails the notability requirements based when we look at the sources. Eric Carr (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericjcarrmiddletownde (talk • contribs) 17:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being social media spokesperson for a political party's youth chapter is not an WP:NPOL-passing role, and the sources are not about him for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG in lieu: they all just quote him as a giver of soundbite in articles whose primary subject is somebody or something else. People aren't notable just because they get quoted in the media: they have to be the subject being spoken about in a source before it counts as support for notability, not the person doing the speaking about a different subject. Bearcat (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Karam06 (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete According to WP:DC.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.