Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aman Hundal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  06:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Aman Hundal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable actress. only 1 significant role, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Doesn’t have reliable news coverage. IndaneLove (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. IndaneLove (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. IndaneLove (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. IndaneLove (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, Fashion,  and India.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with nom; one role does not NACTOR make. I've also removed the YouTube references, as those have been deemed unacceptable sources for a BLP, per WP:RSPYT. Perhaps this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but we can always revisit if the subject gets sustained coverage for other projects in the future. The references right now mention her, but are actually about the film she appears in, not the subject. --Kbabej (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Hundal's role in Dulla Bhatti is significant enough to count toward WP:NACTOR, but I agree that she hasn't appeared in the "multiple" significant roles that that guideline requires. My search didn't find sufficient sourcing to meet the GNG, either: although there's a bit of coverage in Punjabi, it's mostly trivial and I would't consider any of it to be sigcov. Not notable, in my view, at least not yet. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.