Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda's table


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Amanda's table
Delete. I found this working on wikify tags. It just doesn't seem distinctive enough to merit an Encyclopaedia article since the description of its history just sounds like the fate of any other chat room site. Can anyone convince me otherwise? JGF Wilks 07:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete as per nom, nn. Avalon 14:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per article's own claim of non-notability: "Amanda's Table once had a fair share of paying members and a regular clientele, but that crowd has all but disappeared, with only a few stalwarts remaining." Ruby 15:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - Latinus 19:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby. Stifle 00:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.