Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Aardsma (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 22:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Amanda Aardsma
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deletion was discussed back in 2009. Looking over her past I do not see roles that are multiple and significant. She has had very minor roles, or appeared in marginally roles in minor films, nothing that adds up to multiple and significant. In the 2009 discussion someone asseted Miss Colorado Teen USA was a title that granted default notability. Discussions since then have made it clear that even if Miss Colorado USA might be close, Teen titles are no where near that threshold. What remains of coverage is tag along coverage related to her brother who is notable, and even that is not very much. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Perhaps her career will expand in a couple of years, but right now, I am not finding enough to establish notability.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - certainly doesn't meet WP:NACTOR, and searches did not turn up enough to show they meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not independently notable from the pageants themselves. SwisterTwister   talk  22:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.