Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Aldous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Amanda Aldous

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable bio. Fails WP:GNG. sources are the subjects own web sites, 1 source is simply proof that she has an MBE (which does not prouve notability (nearly 1,500 awarded each year) and the 4 source is local news coverage of the festival that she founded but she is just mentioned in the caption of the photo. Notability is not inherited. This seems like a vanity piece. Domdeparis (talk) 11:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - barely any evidence of notability, and the article smells strongly of promotion (if not indeed of paid editing). Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - the article was proposed for deletion (prod process) by user:Winged Blades of Godric near simultaneously to it being nominated here. SpinningSpark 13:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a total lack of independent sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * delete vanity article fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as my nom. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.