Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Baker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Amanda Baker


Non-notable actress. She had "one of the lead roles" on Palmetto Pointe, a show that lasted 12 episodes on I (TV network). That's not exactly NBC, ABC, etc. According to IMDB, the rest of her roles include: "Wardrobe Girl", "Waitress", "Girl in Marsh", one episode of "One Tree Hill", and an unnamed part in a made for TV movie. I don't think any of her parts, not even her lead role, makes her a notable actress. Metros232 13:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: She's probably been on my personal television. If bands with single albums and no-name professors can have articles, so can someone who has been on my TV.  —Wknight94 (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above is not a valid argument to keep; please refer to wiki policies and guidelines. Ohconfucius 06:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete only borderline notable, and WP:INN is pertinent here. Kavadi carrier 15:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. Valrith 15:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. The argument mentioning no-name professors is a Pok%C3%A9mon test; file it under "two wrongs don't make a right."--Ling.Nut 20:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL, I've never seen that before - that's nice. I still maintain that an actress with parts - guest or not - on notable TV shows alongside notable actors is notable.  Would Yassmin Alers be a better comparison?  How about Roy Leep? —Wknight94 (talk) 20:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep! Wikipedia has been delete happy as of late and I fear that many contributor's hard work will discourage participants and will detract from our ability to catalog human knowledge, the purpose of an encyclopedia. Cheers, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above is not a valid argument to keep; please refer to wiki policies and guidelines. Ohconfucius 06:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. She is someway short of WP:BIO. Wish her the best of luck with her career, but a bit-part actress is by my definition not notable. Ohconfucius 06:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep actresses with numerous appearances. Meets WP:BIO. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing in the article suggests that she meets WP:BIO or that relaible sources, about her rather than work in which she was periferally involved, could be found. Eluchil404 09:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Actress on national TV network/show. Best to have TMI than NEI.  —Derrsonn 10:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC) --comment actually made by


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.