Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Brooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 01:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Amanda Brooks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable minor actress; fails WP:PERFORMER. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment from creator: I believe I addressed notability concerns in Talk:Amanda Brooks. I would think her starring role in D-War and her co-starring role in Flightplan would be sufficient to establish notability, not to mention her roles in Stiletto, River's End, The Canyons, Hellhounds, and General Hospital. Plus she has significant coverage in other web sites, see links given in the talk page. I take notability criteria very seriously and I review them carefully before creating an article, so I'm surprised that notability is being raised as an issue here. --RDBury (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply - I see your point of view, RDBury; but D-War was not that big a deal outside Korea; and Brooks did not star in Flightplan; indeed, her role is so obscure that the character is not mentioned anywhere in the article. Brooks is an attractive person with a fanbase; but I just don't see her limited resume adding up to the requisite notability. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I see D-War pop up regularly U.S. television, not sure exactly where but probably on SyFy. Not the most memorable movie but not what you'd call an small, independent production either. I believe Brooks played a stewardess in Flightplan, correct me if I'm wrong. Either way, her role may not have been pivotal to the plot but that doesn't mean she didn't get enough screen time to get her name in the opening credits. The role does seem to be significant enough to be mentioned in the New York Times article as well as the other links listed in the talk page. Even without Flightplan, I think the criterion "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions," is more than met, a NetFlix search lists her in six movies, all but one of which has a WP article. Let me clarify something you mentioned as well. I created the article because she had a red link in the D-War and it seemed to me she met the notability criteria, not article because of a fan base, nor am I particularly a fan. --RDBury (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per meeting WP:NACTOR, significant roles in multiple notable films eg. The Canyons, D-War (who cares if it was a box office success just in South Corea, the requirement is that a film should be notable, not "a commercial success in the US") and Hellhounds (I don't care too much about the above Flightplan discussion, not so crucial). Furthermore, several sources about her in Google News archives (eg., , , ), maybe not so much to say she passes GNG but probably enough to say her and her career were noted. Cavarrone  09:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.