Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Browder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Convincing arguments made to keep the article. KaisaL (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Amanda Browder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist that doesn't pass WP:CREATIVE, made enough of a claim to not be A7, but sources do not indicate this person is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep has had an exhibition at a museum New Museum and many others and seems to have generated enough attention in magazines and other publications for WP:BASIC to be passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The "exhibition" seems to have been one sculpture for a one-day event that was not even held at the New Museum. . Hardly a full exhibition. The sources that are not self-published by the subject are literally one word mentions. The Gothamist piece just says she had a work displayed at the Kickstarter street party and the NYT mention (which I removed) was just her name appearing in a caption of a photograph for a piece on NYC art in which she isn't mentioned. Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Her exhibitions are short term because they are "wraps" of public buildings. I added more references to her article and she passes WP:GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep A museum exhibition and quiet enough references to pass WP:GNG and WP:ARTISTS. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.