Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Fraser (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Amanda Fraser (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An Australian artist who started working full-time on her art in 2011 and seems to have had a couple of paintings exhibited outside of Australia at a New York gallery. Article seems to be autobiographical - the image uploaded is clearly a 'selfie'. I've searched around and can only find one news article in her local newspaper. I can't find any proof of the claim she has her work in public art collections (she doesn't even have her own website to verify the claim). In my view I'd say she is clearly moving in the right direction but not notable enough for WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG yet. Sionk (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nom has it right. There's 1 legit source, but that's from a local paper. The rest are all web ephemera, including at least 1 paid-for listing. Falls far short of WP:GNG. Agricola44 (talk) 14:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:CREATIVE. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.