Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Grove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:WITHDRAWN. (non-admin closure) &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Amanda Grove

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominate for deletion Tagged as of doubtful notability for over 5 years. I couldn't find proof of it. Boleyn (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I have not seen Ms. Grove perform on air since her late-90s stint on CNBC. However, Amanda Grove is a keeper. This article may be a bit slim on details, but there is sufficient encyclopedic content for the reader to get what he or she is looking for. More should be added from the NYT announcement.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * P.S. some bio details are PD (at times for a fee): Dec 1999 and some paywalled stuff.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. With more sourcing and some TLC, I could easily see us keeping this article. But we need that sourcing. I'm coming up blank, but admittedly have not searched long. I'll take a crack at it later today or tomorrow, if someone does not beat me to it. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chicago-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Comment it is an unreferenced blp, so seems clear candidate for deletion. If anyone has found reliable sources, please add them. Boleyn (talk) 12:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)



Nomination withdrawn due to improvements in the article - no longer an unref blp. Thanks for the help, Boleyn (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.