Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Mustard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Amanda Mustard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no significant awards; no substantial works about her ; the referenes are mostly to her own journalism or photogtapjhy.  DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Apparently non-notable – several photo-credits on GNews and in the press, one verifiable credit on GBooks, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources that I'm able to see, either in the article or not. This is obvious undisclosed paid editing in violation of the Terms of Use, created by one now-blocked sockpuppet and moved to mainspace by another. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:17, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obvious COI/UPE issues that need to be cleaned up, but subject passes GNG. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 22:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Created by spammer who was evading their block. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see in-depth coverage by multiple sources that would satisfy the GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.