Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Puspanditaning Sejati (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. It was deleted by Courcelles under G5. (non-admin closure) – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Amanda Puspanditaning Sejati
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The individual lacks notability as an academic, failing to meet the standards outlined in WP:NACADEMIC. The only achievement listed in the article is authoring a guide on English writing techniques. Also, red link in Indonesian wikipedia. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women,  and Indonesia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not found. BLP is entirely edited by sockpuppets. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC).
 * Delete. None of the socks was blocked prior to article creation, so we can't go through a G5 speedy deletion, but her citation record is far from WP:PROF notability and we have no in-depth independent reliable sources as needed for WP:GNG notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NPROF. Qflib (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It says that this is the second AfD nomination. Where is the first? Xxanthippe (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC).
 * The initial nomination is in Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad. I've withdrawn from that nomination and opted to initiate a separate nomination based on the discussions there. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation. I think it would have been better not to have unbundled the AfDs, whose bios are all junk. Separating them wasted the time of volunteer editors who had to look at individual AfDs. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC).
 * When I suggested a procedural close, the bundled AfD had seemed on its way to a trainwreck, and I was concerned about how much more sprawling one discussion could become while evaluating that many articles under varying notability guidelines. How the AfD now appears follows the conclusion of an SPI (I had initially been unaware of) and removal of sock comments/discussion; that context is only in the edit history . Beccaynr (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is no indication of notability. TunGunPun (talk) 07:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.