Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Stevenson (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Amanda Stevenson (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable photographer. jonkerz♠ 12:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to much like a self promotional article. --Ultrablastic123 (talk) 16:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC) - user was blocked for being a sock puppet. Mathewignash (talk) 11:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Pure spam. No credible indication of notability. Working for, say, Campbells Soup doesn't make one notable of itself. Especially with no actual evidence of the work being anything special - or even done. Peridon (talk) 18:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Part also is a copyvio from 2009 at http://www.phillycreativeguide.com/personality/creative_personality_20090401.aspx Peridon (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete No real indication of notability. Like Peridon said, she isn't notable because simply because she worked for a certain company; she doesn't hold any awards or the like. —  Waterfox ~talk~ 21:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.