Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda and Jerad Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Also: Original article title now a redirect to an event article, as is appropriate. Steven Walling &bull; talk   00:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Amanda and Jerad Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a newspaper. damiens.rf 18:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Easily meets WP:SIGCOV. Joefromrandb (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep It just needs to be moved to satisfy point 3 in WP:NOTNEWS. The name should reflect that the article is about the shooting, not the shooters. KinkyLipids (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:SIGCOV and GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets SIGCOV. The fact that it seems to have been ideologically motivated makes it even more notable. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Speedy Keep. I created the article, as it meets all notability guidelines, and there are an abundant of reliable sources available to develop this article further. I have added some good sources in the article's talk page that could be used in that context. Just simply I am too upset about this terrible event at this time to contemplate working on the article. Cwobeel (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - not every murder is notable, but one that's received this level of media coverage, including comments from senior politicians, arguably is. Robofish (talk) 23:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as easily passes SIGCOV as well as GNG. —Davey 2010→ Talk to me 01:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is an article on a similar event 2009 Pittsburgh police shootings --Librsh (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 *  Keep or redirect - There is seemingly a great amount of coverage about the article. It will remain to be seen whether the coverage will continue, but for now, I believe it is notable.  If the article cannot be kept, it should be redirected to List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, June 2014 or Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * "List of of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, June 2014"? That is not the subject of the article. The subject is the killing of two police officers and one civilian, based on far-right and fringe beliefs. Cwobeel (talk) 03:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 *  Reply - I understand that, however, it is believed that Jerad was killed by a law enforcement officer. Also, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department has a section for fallen officers. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - For better or for worse the subjects clearly meet WP:SIGCOV. --Jersey92 (talk) 05:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - while victims of such crimes are often not notable (ie notable only for their death, thus the murder of mr. foo articles), the alleged perps often have a long history prior to the event which made them "famous". this history is currently being pored over with a fine tooth comb. their back story prior to the shooting doesnt easily fit into an article on just the shooting. Wait, are people actually debating the shooting as an article? i was actually arguing for the people having an article. while that is at least theoretically debatable, the shooting is NOT. its now moved to 2014 Las Vegas shootings, no separate article for the couple, which i had assumed was what was being discussed. so this is a Tachyon Keep, where we go back in time and retroactively keep.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm pleased to see more resolve to cover such well documented events.  I don't deny that the changes in coverage (suicide versus police shooting for example) pose problems, but these events never stop getting new interpretations.  ah-ooh shoo-be doo-wa  Wnt (talk) 16:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.