Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amapola Cabase (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No arguments to keep - general consensus seems to be that she is not notable Kevin (talk) 21:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Amapola Cabase
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject does not meet verifiable notability from third party reliable sources. Sources given are the subjects own website, a Public Relations release, and a blog. Initial PROD removed by User:Jclemens for the following reason: "Decline Prod. Article is long enough and old enough to stand for AfD if desired". RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  —RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. All I was able to find in news was this reference, though I also found this book.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The article you have referenced is an opinion piece, but does give reference to the fact that she sang at a hotel; the book that you have referenced is one of several books she has claimed to have written, but does writing a book and singing at a hotel make the person meet WP:NN, more specifically WP:BIO and/or WP:AUTHOR and/or WP:MUSICBIO? --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope -- I haven't had time to go through all my searches, but from what I've seen so far she doesn't make it from what I can tell.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: There are a lot of claims in the article that would indicate immediate notability, and the few sources that can be found seem to agree with the general content. The contrast with the apparent lack of sources could be due to our inability to find Philipino sources. I am going to notify the Tambayan Philippines project, and I would wait for them before taking a decision. -- Cycl o pia -  talk  14:06, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have already included this delete discussion on their delete source page; and like that aweful commerical, I am also a member ;-). I'll go ahead and edit the appropriate section of their main page to include it. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.