Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Amarni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Amar Amarni

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

two year old unreferenced blp for a non-notable painter Oo7565 (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you followed the instructions at WP:BEFORE and make an effort to find sources before nominating the article for deletion? - Mgm|(talk) 10:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 11:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

yes i didOo7565 (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep article of sourcable individual who passes WP:CREATIVE.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I've had a look at the online material in French. He's had a solo show in the Galerie du Tableau, which doesn't look an especially significant gallery. It shows an artist a month , and I suspect that it's a gallery space for hire given the turnover. He's participated in a competition , but he didn't win anything. No museum shows, no works in museum collections, a solo show in a small gallery, exhibited in town halls and art centres (according to the article), participated in a competition. The subject falls way below WP:CREATIVE. And there's no press coverage to meet WP:N.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ethico. Johnbod (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. Where was the source for the article? And one of the two links is broken. I also agree with Ethicoaestheticist. -- Arty pants, Babble 18:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:CREATIVE on all points. He hasn't created any significant works, nor is he himself significant in his field.  No reliable sources have been found to say otherwise by participants here or by any other editors during the past year that the notability tag has been on the article.  Them  From  Space  05:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ethico...Modernist (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.