Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara's law (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Amara's law
del totally nonnotable witticism by a nonnotable person. If exclude wikipedia, about 97 unique google links. The fact that a couple of people used it does not makes it encyclopedic. `'mikkanarxi 16:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with Mikka. TSO1D 03:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 02:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. MER-C 03:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur -- possibly even speedy -- Simon Cursitor 11:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as fully non notable.--John Lake 18:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.