Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara Fashion House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Amara Fashion House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely trash sources. Creator had a COI/UPE issue. See another nomination: Articles for deletion/Inkfruit (third nomination). They self-declared that they are "working on Social Media Optimization". No reliable, independent, in-depth sources exist for this "fashion house". How it has stood for 10 years boggles the mind. Fails Wiki notability guidelines horribly. MaysinFourty (talk) 08:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC) PS, Note: Creator of this article was involved in other COI/UPE cases MaysinFourty (talk) 08:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MaysinFourty (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MaysinFourty (talk) 08:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC) –


 * Delete. A peacockery-heavy article about an utterly non-notable shop. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone  22:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.