Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amarachi Okafor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like the community isn't authorizing the deletion here, although it might have helped to link some of the sources presented. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Amarachi Okafor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This biographical puff-piece started by our sockpuppety friend and fixed up by subsequent editors, although not sufficiently to make it into a neutral article, concerns a person of questionable notability and is based on sources of questionable reliability. Please will the community authorise its deletion? —S Marshall T/C 02:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 02:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment initial inquiries portend notability. Included in the Luciano Benetton Collection. Included in the Jogja Bienniale. Will have a look over the next couple days to see if I can find more.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see any promotional content after it was cleaned up by Atlantic306 (talk) 00:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is sufficient notability here. Certainly the classic artist type, with a long history of work. It will be a wee seed article satisfying WP:THREE until she becomes internationally famous. scope_creep Talk  09:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - found this article in a scholarly journal, Art & Design Studies. Netherzone (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Furthermore @ I don’t think I’ve ever opposed your !vote before in an AFD but this time it’s a no no for me.Celestina007 (talk) 01:56 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage such as The Vanguard and The Jakarta Post, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability is established per sources, collection and coverage found. Article should be improved not deleted. An in-depth WP:BEFORE should have been performed before nomination. Netherzone (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It was. I disagreed with your rather hopeful assessment of this person's notability.—S Marshall T/C 13:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.