Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amarachi Okafor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It appears that the article has undergone editing during the period of discussion, and that these modifications may help establish notability. Or not. Rel-listing for a fourth week does not seem to be in the best interest of the encyclopedia. There is truly no consensus in this present discussion for deletion, drafting, or keeping. I would recommend those interested in the topic apply effort to firmly establish notability, and that we come back here and try again in a few months. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Amarachi Okafor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I nominated this hagiography for deletion in 2019, and I remain deeply perplexed by the "keep" outcome. I wonder if the community would like to reconsider? —S Marshall T/C 18:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 18:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 18:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I read over the article and the previous AfD process.  The article definitely needs work (More areas need citations and more wikilinks), however, she seems notable enough for a wikipedia article.  {Message to S Marshall: In my opinion, the article should be a draft, due to how little there is in it, however, since it went through a previous AfD process with a "Keep" outcome, I have to vote keep.}  Elijahandskip (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * We can draftify an article that was previously kept. That might even be the best outcome, unless and until someone decides to rewrite it with less promotional text and more citations.—S Marshall T/C 19:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage, passing WP:GNG. The article can be edited to be clear of promotion instead of deletion, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Edited by whom? You?—S Marshall T/C 20:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No, apparently by AleatoryPonderings. :)  I agree with his proposal to smerge to El Anatsui.—S Marshall T/C 22:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * yes I did edit it before AleatoryPonderings, sticking with keep Atlantic306 (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per, , . Alternatively, a selective merge to El Anatsui is possible, as it appears she is best known as a member of his atelier. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I gave up on finding SIGCOV after about 15 minutes of searching. Items like this look promising, but in fact it's an official publication of the JOGA bienniale. There just is not a lot of SIGCOV out there, and there are no museum collections or reviews of solo shows as far as I could see. Selective merge to El Anatsui does not make sense.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong <span style="font:0.75em Verdana,sans-serif;color:#000000;">| [gab] ||  03:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Sadly, not enough significant coverage. Trillfendi (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per discussion, previous discussion, and the edits since the nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.