Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amarapedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  22:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Amarapedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As written, this fails WP:GNG. I cannot find any good sources, but maybe they are in non-English language. Ex I found, but I cannot judge how reliable and on-topic it is. Any comments appreciated. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Covered in Basque-language magazines Kulturaldia (ref above and here) and Argia (here), and mentioned in the page about the city-wide Donostiapedia project on the Capital of Culture website. In Spanish, substantial piece in the regional paper El Diario Vasco, and a brief mention in El Pais here (national newspaper). We've got an article about the similar project Monmouthpedia Noyster  (talk),  14:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, demonstrated secondary source coverage in multiple different publications. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Flashy318 (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.