Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing Grace: Jeff Buckley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Amazing Grace: Jeff Buckley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sign of notability and WP:RS Behind the moors (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the Rolling Stone  article already cited, I found this review and this review and this review. That's enough to show notability. Cullen328 (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep More than enough and reviews on RS sources.   scope_creep Talk  21:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as shown above the film has reviews in multiple reliable sources and therefore passes WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 03:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. I've also cleaned the article up quite a bit. I'd imagine that there's likely more on Newspapers.com, but I don't have the time to look for it right now. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡) ' 13:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - no sign of notability Puglia1999 (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per above sources which are enough to demonstrate notability. Brian O'Conner  07:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.