Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazon Prime Pantry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Amazon Prime. Daniel (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Amazon Prime Pantry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

service discontinued, service has been discontinued, in some countries a while back - and integrated/merged into regular delivery service regardless of whether one has 'Prime' Kleo-Sine (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Wikipedia preserves history and keeps articles of notable business entities even if they are discontinued. It's all part of the collective information record. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  17:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep - no valid rationale for deletion given Spiderone  17:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - service has been discontinued, in some countries a while back - and integrated/merged into regular delivery service regardless of whether one has 'Prime' Kleo-Sine (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Amazon Prime instead of deleting. Trillfendi (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amazon Prime, which appears to already duplicate the content of this article, word for word, including all sources. While I agree that the nomination did not provide a valid reason for straight Deletion, there is also no reason to have a duplicative article, especially when the content is not extensive enough to justify it being WP:SPLIT from the main topic. Rorshacma (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect As per above. Setreis (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Tim above: it doesn't matter that the service is discontinued; if it's a notable business (which I believe this is), it should be part of the collective information record. I am not aware of any policy stating companies/services that have been discontinued should have their articles deleted. Per a WP:BEFORE search, the following are references not currently used on the page: The Seattle Times, Progressive Grocer, Retail Wire, Mashed, CNBC, CNET, Fox News, and myriad others. --Kbabej (talk) 03:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: per above.  Gerald WL  08:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amazon Prime: Article is a complete duplicate of content in the target article (A10 except for its age). There are not sources to show this merits a stand alone article. At best this is an unnecessary split, an example of creating an article for no other reason than to have another article.  // Timothy :: t | c | a  14:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Timorhty and Rorshacma. Deletion nomination is invalid, notability is not temporary, but the article seems superfluous to the information in the Prime article. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Rorshacma. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.