Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazonica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Amazonica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGIN. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 17:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 21:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'm not seeing any sources in the news connecting UNESCO with an organization named "Amazonica," though the word is common enough that it's difficult to sort through all the unrelated hits. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above. No sources on the German Wikipedia either. I hate to see this free publicity being given to an outfit that may or may not be legitimate. There are no WP:Reliable sources to attest to its WP:Notability. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.