Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amba Tremain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Amba Tremain

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is written like an advertisement and it can be clarified well. I suggested to delete the article or merge to an article. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability of WP:BIO. -Porch corpter (contribs) 00:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. There is some evidence of notability here (this is a forum thread but the Mirror article it claims to have copypasted from looks genuine) but given the lack of sources out there there's too many question marks over verifiability. (Should someone find sources for this, of course, I'll think again.) Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find a reliable source to confirm that she appeared on the television show or to confirm the claim that she was cheated by a crooked manager. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  07:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not met the WP:GNG. Needs more sources.--Ryan.germany (talk) 10:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Reluctant delete, because I would expect this individual to be considered notable as the winner of a TV talent show (Don't ask me to explain how that is encyclopedic, but this does seem to meet our current bar for notability). However this article doesn't have one independent WP:RS on it, so it has to go (unless fixed, sharpish). Andy Dingley (talk) 14:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable - no sources provided and I can find myself. Also written like an advert. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.