Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambassador Downs Mobile Home Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Ambassador Downs Mobile Home Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was previously PRODed, but the article creator removed the PROD based on belief that listing in the USGS Geographic Names Information System is automatic justification for article. A trailer-park or any neighborhood within a city/town needs to be independently notable. This one is not. See Articles for deletion/A-1 Trailer Park, Arizona for similar discussion. MB 22:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Per WP:GEOLAND: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." By definition, the USGS designation is legal recognition of the place. And the USGS listing gives the location the definition of a "populated place". There is nothing, as the nominator claims, in Geoland which says that a populated place which meets the main requirement of Geoland must also show independent notability if it is located within a city/town.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete upon inspection, these all appear to be non-notable neighbourhoods within recognized communities where you can park a mobile home. GEOLAND does not automatically confer notability, therefore. GEOLAND is expressly not a carte blanche for every subdivision. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found out this place does exist, and is big enough that people post personal ads for, lets say, adventures ... ahem. (I'm not going to link what I found, but if you care to do so, go ahead and plunge into the darker recesses of the Internet. Just clear your browser and/or wash your hands afterwards.) I'm furthermore not convinced that this is that unusual. I'm also going to state again that we are not a webhost for personal ads and real estate offers. Since I can't find any sources as to the subdivisions' population or area, I'm going to say that it probably does not pass my standards. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- a non notable subdivision with insufficient RS coverage to pass GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. as above.  DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.