Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambassador of Iceland to Turkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After three relists, a consensus has not been established. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Ambassador of Iceland to Turkey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. Iceland has never has a resident ambassador to Turkey and there is no evidence the non resident ambassador did anything noteworthy. LibStar (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a list, not an article. A core tenant of Wikipedia is that it has elements of an almanac. "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been." --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * please demonstrate why this list is notable. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * delete The position itself is not inherently notable (Ambassadors as a class are not) Nor is the Turkey-Iceland relationship a particularly notable one.  Although they do know how to kick a Futbol, Iceland is of little significance to diplomacy. We do not keep lists of all incumbents of non-notable government posts; not even the non-notable ambassadorial posts of major players, like Turkey.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * keep There is an free trade agreement between Turkey and EFTA (see http://www.efta.int/free-trade/free-trade-agreements/turkey). Iceland is part of EFTA and most of it's free trade agreements come from EFTA.--Snaevar (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That is not specifically about the ambassador. Where is the significant coverage about the ambassador? LibStar (talk) 23:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. North America1000 09:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - It's at least plausible that someone could be looking for information about Icelandic ambassadors to Turkey, and I see no harm in keeping this list. There's actually a really great essay on the topic, which includes quite a bit of information on the applicability of notability guidelines to list-based articles. Kurtis (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * see WP:NOHARM. secondly there has never been a resident ambassador. LibStar (talk) 11:47, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-resident Ambassadors should fall below the line. MLA (talk) 04:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.