Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 20:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Amber Court

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article on a property development in Malaysia that is packed with great detail, mostly from primary sources, and has received some mention in general sources but nothing that looks to me like it establishes notability. Similar articles could be written for tens of thousands of new buildings each year but there’s nothing really encyclopaedic about them. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep but clean up. The Wikipedia article is indeed a rambling over-detailed account of the various developments around 'Samaworld' should probably be half the current length. But the Amber Court development seems to have developed a reputation for its poor state of repair and possible haunting. After all there are a couple of news articles, a book and a German TV documentary about it. Sionk (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: The developments around Genting Highlands are not like any others. More costly civil engineering work is needed because of the difficult mountain-landscape and climate. The companies working on these projects are from all over the world, hence the international attention at the time. SamaWorld is directly connected with Amber Court. The SamaWorld development had strong media attention at the time, but not so much today (but it is still relevant). Amber Court gained a lot of fame on social media over the last 10 years. There exist many videos with millions of views from "YouTubers" around the world. It's the main location for the movie "Haunted Hotel" which boosted the attention in Asia. Last year the Galileo documentary was broadcasted in Germany and my German article about Amber Court was accepted to Wikipedia. Amber Court has constant media attention in Malaysia too (as seen in the article references), and is included in the List of reportedly haunted locations. I tried not to focus on the "haunted topic" because Wikipedia should be neutral (and we all know that it's nonsense). I wouldn't call my sources "primary" because nearly all of them are from well-known newspapers (I think blueprints, statistics, etc are called primary). Thanks + greetings --126Edward (talk) 22:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article needs cleaned up, but there appears to be ample sourcing. NemesisAT (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, while the article needs cleanup, there is enough sourcing.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.