Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Doig-Thorne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Amber Doig-Thorne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Attempted to research Amber Doig-Thorne and only was able to produce results for the viral "Boyfriend VS Girlfriend" videos; not able to locate any significance of Amber herself. WP:NWEB indicates that fame does not establish notability and that significant independent sources need to cover the established topic. This article fails to meet that criteria, therefore I nominate this article for deletion. This article failed a prior CSD:A7; therefore nominating via AfD. Dane2007 (talk) 21:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no credible claims of notability that make the subject of this article suitable for inclusion in an encyclopaedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - other than the videos, "celebrity" has no other credibility other than school and university events. Cannot find any information on premieres or dancing and modelling. Citations are self made sites and does not cohere with the information given about real celebrities. Almost appears self-made. I have  also searched the celebrities on whole wiki celeb  which is "celebrities" like Amber and if this page requires a wikipedia page then also do all of the unknown social media personalities that have also managed to get a page on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prettyallen123 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete; wholly agree with above. Best, FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  19:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 19:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.