Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Amber Jones

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as meeting WP:GNG based on the sources. No indication nom did a before on any of the Green Party leaders they AFD'd. ミラP 00:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a failed candidate who came in a distant 3rd in a 2008 race for a seat in the provincial legislature, then served 2 years as head of a minor, province-level political party. Not a notable career.16:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotButtigieg (talk • contribs)
 * Delete a failed candidate for public office.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep certainly minor politician in national terms, but notable locally and at provincial level. NB WP:POLITICIAN allows for un-electeds when WP:GNG is met.  I'm adding some more information and sources. --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Following my speedy close of the DRV at Deletion review/Log/2020 January 10 I am relisting this. Note that the nominator's opinion should be discounted, as they have been banned, but subsequent good faith !votes should be assessed as normal.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm struggling to find multiple reliable secondary sources that cover the subject in a significant manner. Hopefully, someone can prove me wrong! Missvain (talk) 06:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Revisitng; after running more searches and failing to find any new sources that support notability, I continue to advocate for deletion.23:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotButtigieg (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.