Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Nicole Brooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 05:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Amber Nicole Brooks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable as an academic. Main claim to fame seems to be as a reviewer. Page is borderline promotional as it stands. Deb (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It reads more like a résumé than a Wikipedia article.Trillfendi (talk) 23:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above consensus. Seems to fail WP:BIO as a search for this individual returns insufficient third-party sources. Editor10293813 (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON, no notability evident through WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, or other criteria. As she continues along her academic career track, presumably she'll publish some books and we can use the reviews of them as the basis for notability. But we're far from that point now. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete. None of the additional criteria in WP:NBIO are met, and sourcing fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. Sam Sailor 19:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.