Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Rose (porn star) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus John Reaves (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Amber Rose (porn star)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It's been nearly two years since the original AFD (found here), and there is still not a valid argument present in the article explaining why Ms. Rose is notable per WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil 22:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment You really should link to Amber Rose (porn star) directly, not to the disambig page. FrozenPurpleCube 03:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Attempted to fix links. -- saberwyn 06:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being on the "100 Worst Porn Movies" list means nothing, it's just a list some random person put up, not a reliable source.  Barring a new major claim of notability, this should go.  Mango juice talk 16:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Easyas12c 22:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do you care to elaborate on why, Easyas12c? She definitely fails WP:PORNBIO on points 1-4, and performances in two films does not firmly establish her as a prolific performer in the queefing genre. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 23:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. This is likely a performer in a niche genre.  As such it may meet notability guidelines.  I think the case here is why it does not meet that requirement.  The article appears to assert meeting this.  Vegaswikian 06:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Seems notable, but I would need to see a few videos first to completely make up my mind. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  01:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Well, she has a nich in the porn genre. I don't care for it, but WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a reason to delete this and I don't want to blow hot air.  --Oakshade 02:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - More evidence needed that she has been notable or prolific within the genre of queefing. It appears she has only been in two queefing movies and it isn't clear whether she is one of the most notable performers in this genre. Epbr123 17:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Epbr123. "Notable" within the queefing genre (I almost can't believe there is a specific niche for this) suggests there be some independent coverage, and none is cited.  Prolific in the genre is the least convincing criterion for inclusion and must surely require more than two movies.-- Kubigula (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.