Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber report


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 17:08, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Amber report
This was nominated for speedy deletion as patent nonsense. However, all of the words do make sense, and so it does not qualify. That said, the article is on an idea that the author admits does not exist in the real world, and only thinks would be a good idea. As wikipedia is not a crystal ball, I'm sending this here. With a Delete vote. Icelight 22:28, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, though I agree with the article for the most part. Bad news does sell. --Bayyoc 22:39, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research, of a sort CDC   (talk)  22:51, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't exist CanadianCaesar 23:25, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The author makes a good point about media coverage, however. -Soltak 23:56, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: doesn't exist, opinion, you name it. Jason 00:56, 7 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.