Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambi (programming language)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Ambi (programming language)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable programming language. Page created by language creator. No secondary sources available that I can find. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm not sure of the relevance of the list of seemingly unconnected AfDs... As to Ambi, there's quite a lot on Google - but... A lot of it seems to be not the stuff sought as reliable sources here. I'm not feeling up to digging too much at the moment, but someone who isn't full of flu might find something worth adding. Or the creator of the article might.... It seems an interesting concept, but that's not a basis for an article. Peridon (talk) 16:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment 2 It is worth noting that the nominator of this AfD is an SPA, which always makes me suspicious. Peridon (talk) 16:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not an SPA, I had a previous account on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/chaos_on_the_internet). I thought that name wasn't professional enough so I've been editing on IP addresses and finally just registered a new account with my real name (as per Wikipedia policy, I didn't request a name change because I didn't feel I had a significant enough edit history to warrant it). This, however, is the first AfD I've done. I merely followed the directions on the Wikipedia page; I don't know where all of those unconnected AfDs came from. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough Suspicions allayed. Peridon (talk) 17:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this programming language. Joe Chill (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no notability suggested. Wikipedia invariably fails to maintain articles about obscure software. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 23:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.