Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambrose Mendy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 00:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Ambrose Mendy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Mendy Stats )

This article is full of grammatical and spelling errors. I've made a few edits but it still falls short of wiki standards. There are many unreferenced facts. I'm also not convinced this person warrants an article dedicated to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HallucigeniaUK (talk • contribs) 16:55, 29 December 2012‎
 * Keep No shortage of sources, I have stubbed the article and am adding references now. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Orphaned AfD Relisted. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's plenty of coverage of him. --Michig (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. AfD is not for cleanup.  And the RS coverage meets GNG.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It appears the article has been gutted. In conducting WP:BEFORE there appears to be plenty of sources. The article needs work but seems to meet WP:ANYBIO due to WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw talk 00:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.