Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambush drake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Ambush drake

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced stub article about a little-known Dungeons & Dragons monster. Fails WP:GNG, not mentioned in any independent sources. Not a very active user (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - no real world notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3.5 edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that the proposed target for the merge is also being considered for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 08:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. The name is so vague it can describe any number of gaming monsters, so a merge is ill advised.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very minor, non-notable D&D creature. No non-primary sources exist demonstrating any sort of real-world notability.  The proposed target article for a Redirect/Merge is something that I'm not sure why is even on Wikipedia - its basically a table of contents of a bunch of 3.5 Edition books - so I can't endorse any sort of redirect there.  Rorshacma (talk) 15:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --qedk (t 桜 c) 16:14, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOTDIR of D & D. No reliable sources in detail, this borders on original research. Bearian (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.