Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Amelex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very scant coverage fails to meet WP:CORP. The two sources available are a profile of the CEO, who has been editing this article (User:Koliver2), and a bog-standard "companies being honored at a local awards ceremony" piece. Note that when searching the name, there are other companies known as Amelex with no relation to this one. Raymie (t • c) 17:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur with nom and above delete. Small business with no claim of notability. MB 01:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Only WP:ROUTINE coverage. Nothing noteworthy. TheMagikCow (talk) 09:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and topic shows no evidence of notability. -- HighKing ++ 21:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Much as I did not want to vote this way, due to how old this company is and therefore notable in theory, I am in agreement that this article could be removed.TH1980 (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.Not notable WP:CORPDEPTH. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.