Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Army controversy

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 17:45, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

America's Army controversy
1: Original research. 2: Would be difficult to make NPOV because the very existence of a controversy is a POV. jdb &#x274b; (talk) 03:51, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Nestea 04:34, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, and might I add that one article on a game is usually more than enough. Harro5 06:13, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Most of it is redundant with the main America's Army article, so delete. &mdash; A.M. 07:07, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research (and merely the result of personal dispute). Peter Isotalo 10:03, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Megan1967 05:32, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.