Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Credit Union Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 00:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

America's Credit Union Museum
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

contested prod. No indication of how this subject is notable. lacks references to 3rd party sources RadioFan (talk) 23:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Third party sources are not lacking: . The article can easily be upgraded. Warrah (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment but how is worthy of being noted? The google news search above has some hits but they are to press releases from the museum itself or to a industry journal who's connection to the museum is not clear.  This coverage is largely simple mentions of the existence of the museum and not the kind of significant coverage that WP:GNG requires.  The article has been tagged for over 2.5 years with reference concerns without improvement.--RadioFan (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Site used for campaign appearances shows one example.     shows international interest in it, and the fact that the first American credit union was established by French Americans. Notable thus on two grounds.  For which   and a multitude of others are on point. Collect (talk) 23:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't read French well enough but it seems from 1st result the building itself may be notable in addition to the news references about the museum referenced above. Personal thoughts on being "worthy" have no bearing in notability guidelines. StarM 01:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely notable for the historic significance of the building. The article could use a little fleshing out, but shouldn't be deleted. Gobonobo  T C 08:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The museum is listed as "Building at 418-420 Notre Dame Ave." in the National Register of Historic Places. All NRHP sites are considered notable. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep — to expand more on what Ken says, its National Register nomination form (while not online, it's a valid print source) will list multiple reliable sources that cover the building. A property without strong sources can't be documented enough to be able to be listed on the Register. Nyttend (talk) 00:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable per availability of third-party sources and listing on the National Register. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 07:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - building seems to meet notability guidelines, meets WP:BUILDING (even though that wasn't ratified).  Cocytus   [»talk«]  02:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.