Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Next Top Model, Cycle 11


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect. Done. Can be restored to article as and when it's aired/has lots of sources to draw upon. Neıl ☎  10:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 11
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:CRYSTAL, this show, although it is scheduled, isn't gonna air until September, and casting isn't even done yet, as far as I know. I checked the criteria for speedy, and none of them really fit..... SKS2K6 (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to America's Next Top Model. Normally I would delete per WP:CRYSTAL, but since this is so closely connected to the ANTM page I think a redirect is better for the time being.  I think that in about a few months there will be reliable sources for Cycle 11 (as there are for 10 and below), but not yet.  The casting call has gone out, but all I can find are reprints of the press release for that, which aren't enough.  When Cycle 11 gets its own sources it should get its own article, but redirect it to the main ANTM page until then. Staeiou (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did clean it up a bit and make it look like America's Next Top Model, Cycle 10, just to be fair. Staeiou (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the main article for now, until more information is available. As I understand it, these season articles are the equivalent of episode articles, and as such WP usually frowns upon articles on episodes that haven't been broadcast yet. Such is the case here. Since it's been announced, this isn't a WP:CRYSTAL situation, but it's still premature to have an article. 23skidoo (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Chris M. (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above to preserve location of inevitable, yet-to-be-written article. Deletion would be a worse option; when sufficient sources provide enough information for a new article after redirecting, the already-existing infobox, etc., can be easily restored by simply returning to an earlier version rather than creating it from scratch again. B.Wind (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.