Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America's Next Top Model, Cycle 14


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to America's Next Top Model . ... for now JForget  00:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 14
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

That article will be release by March 2010 and it has not yet announce by the network. Unless it doesn't meet WP:NFF and per WP:CRYSTALBALL.


 * Note see America's Next Top Model, Cycle 11 AFD. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 13:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to its parent article Delete it away. Its too early to create the article. It will recreate after the announcement by the CW network. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 12:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect per WP:CRYSTAL.   talk 12:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect per nom. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no need for the article this early. Sure theres some information starting to leak through already, but its not enough for an article yet. :) (Kyleofark (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Delete as pure WP:CRYSTAL. Bearian (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect, the cycle has been picked up as of last summer and is already filming/being produced. To delete the page is unnecessary and would be a waste of time as it is bound to be recreated within the next four months.--Whadaheck (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or redirect. It's going to be created again in time to come. Similar to how Survivor or The Amazing Race has pages of their future seasons, I see no strong case for deletion. ZephyrWind (talk) 08:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.