Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Blackshirts Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

American Blackshirts Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no evidence that this meets our criteria for notability. I note it was incorporated:3/27/2014,  Doug Weller (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * And how exactly does ABP not meet criteria for notability? It's the only italian fascist party in the United States.--OCCullens (talk) 06:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * User:OCCullens, you could have typed in to the Wikipedia search field WP:NOTABILITY That would take you to our main page and from there you want Notability (organizations and companies). You should read that in detail, but the nutshell version is "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it. I searched and could find nothing. Doug Weller (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, I see. The page will have to wait then.--OCCullens (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. Ogress smash! 04:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Can find absoultely no coverage in reliable sources. Only coverage comes on Facebook and weird fascist websites. AusLondonder (talk) 03:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I cannot source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - While I favor the lowest of possible barriers for inclusion for political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections without regard to size or ideology, I remain unconvinced that INCOME OF $77 AND EXPENDITURES OF $72 in the first six months of this year are sufficient to confirm existence as an actual political party. Still, we should be very, very slow to delete this sort of material, since it is the sort of information that the public has the right to expect in a comprehensive encyclopedia. (That is, Ignore All Rules, if necessary...) Carrite (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Cannot find anything in the search engines which shows this group comes anywhere near close to notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.