Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Canine Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   soft delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

American Canine Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG; not mentioned in any reliable sources; very promotional "one of the largest registries", "ACA's blue ribbon panel" etc. Note: articles for the 'rings' used as refs (and external links) were recently deleted.  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  10:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please also check the article talk page - it seems to be frequently blanked.  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  10:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment. Promotional article written by a confirmed COI (see screen-name). Per the deleted material from the Talk page (thanks for the heads-up, nominator), it appears to exist to issue "papers" to puppy-mill mongers. See also: . My instinct would be Delete, or incorporate some of the puppy mill accusations from WP:RS into the article. Softlavender (talk) 07:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.